Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Joker (2019 film)/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of accolades received by Joker (2019 film)[edit]

Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Joker (2019 film)/archive1

Nominator(s): Sgubaldo (talk) 01:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is my third accolades-related FLC. I have brought the article in line with similar FLs, added missing awards, removed some non-notable ones and improved sourcing. Joker was initially somewhat controversial, but it has also received significantly more awards than the films in my other nominations.

Note: My Hacksaw Ridge nomination has received three supports, so I am adding a second one. Sgubaldo (talk) 01:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MPGuy2824

The result column sorts weirdly with won > runner-up > nom > 23rd > 20th > 13th.
That's all I got for now. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It sorts alphabetically. Is it supposed to sort as win, runner-up, numerical places, nom and viceversa? Sgubaldo (talk) 09:03, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jumping in to say that IMO it should sort by placement, for want of a better term, so Won, then runner-up, then "numbered" places from 3rd downwards, then un-numbered "nominated"..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Now sorts properly regardless of whether you look in ascending or descending order. Sgubaldo (talk) 09:28, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:52, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source review[edit]

I'll do this source review, numbers taken from this revision [2] Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 03:51, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Refs 7, 10, 32, 41 are live, though seems to be listed as dead.

Ref 41 is listed as ANSA and not spelt out as opposed to British Society of Cinematographers.

Only problems I see now. I'll have the spoties done soon. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 03:51, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All have been returned back to life.
Fully spelt out.

Sgubaldo (talk) 09:33, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ref 5 Good
Ref 10 Good
Ref 16 Good
Ref 19 Good
Ref 22 Good
Ref 28 Good
Ref 30 Good
Ref 35 Good
Ref 48 Good
Ref 57 Good
Ref 68 Good
Ref 70 Good
Ref 74 Good
Ref 97 Good
Ref 101 Good
Ref 105 Good

Spell out RTBF in ref 24.

What's the relability of AwardsWatch? That's all I got. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 21:52, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spelt out RTBF.
AwardsWatch is a website on the film industry and awards; it's similar to Awards Daily. It seems reliable for film awards and it's been used in FLs already. My reasoning for using it was because I wanted secondary source for all the accolades, but sometimes none of the bigger websites covered a specific one while AwardsWatch did. Sgubaldo (talk) 22:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 05:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:02, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as this is a nearly perfect list. Chompy Ace 21:14, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting. --Pres N 19:44, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.