Talk:Atavista

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Repackage[edit]

isn’t this technically just a repackage of 3.15.20? 2600:6C56:6500:ADB6:9C36:24E4:41A6:9386 (talk) 14:44, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It has a different rollout, new songs, and significant media attention from secondary sources. Feels like a "Taylor's Version" of 3.15.20, and each TV gets a separate page because it has enough unique information to warrant it. That's my view anyway. Jzahck (talk) 14:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

  • ... that prior to its 2024 release, a track on the album Atavista could be heard in a 2019 Google Pixel ad?
Created by JayceFey (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

JayceFey (talk) 14:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Hi JayceFey! Just a small recommendation: While I am aware that Track listing and Personnel sections are generally citation-free, the final sentence of the Background section that mentions the absence of three tracks in the previous albums lacks a citation. It may have been intended as an extension of the primary source from the previous album, but I would advise citing it with a secondary source if possible. The hook is interesting. Second DYK nomination so QPQ-free. Earwig's Detector shows a 4.8% similarity, but it's not plagiarism after double checking. The article is well-written overall. Prince of EreborThe Book of Mazarbul 11:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Prince of Erebor! Has the issue been resolved? I added a citation to the section you mentioned. JayceFey (talk) 15:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Track Comparisons[edit]

A section in the tracklist referring to the changes made to each track would be nice. Ollie2Ollie (talk) 02:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]